Astronomy TECHNOLOGY TODAY
35
By James R. Dire, Ph.D.
In 2003, I became interested in purchas-
ing a hydrogen-alpha solar telescope for view-
ing the sun. For about the same price as a
dedicated H-alpha telescope, I decided to pur-
chase a 0.7-angstrom bandwidth, 40-mm (1.6
inch) H-alpha filter set and a high-quality 80-
mm (3.1 inch) f/6 refractor to use with it. I
had never owned a good quality refractor and
this equipment would allow me to conduct
solar observations as well as use the refractor
for wide-field nighttime observing, and possi-
bly CCD imaging. Since my main goal was
narrow bandwidth H-alpha observing, it did-
n’t matter whether the telescope was an achro-
matic or apochromatic refractor. So I bought
an achromatic refractor.
I should explain the differences between
these two refractor types. Refracting lenses
suffer from what is called chromatic aberra-
tion; different wavelengths of visible light do
not focus at the same distance from the lens.
To counter this effect, refractors usually have
two or more objective lenses. In a two-lens
system, the doublet is designed so that two
different visible wavelengths focus at the same
point. This is called an achromat. Most of the
chromatic aberration is eliminated, except
near the short-wavelength end of the visible
spectrum. In a three-lens system, the triplet is
designed so that three different visible wave-
lengths focus at the same point. This is called
an apochromat, or APO for short. The result
is that all visible chromatic aberration is elim-
inated. Because there are more elements in the
objective, APOs are usually heavier and more
expensive than achromatic refractors.
My 80-mm telescope performed quite
well with the H-alpha filter. The nighttime
views where also stunning. I was hooked on
refractors! The scope did show noticeable pur-
ple fringing around bright stars and planets,
as well as the Moon, the usual sign of chro-
matic aberration in doublets. CCD imaging
did not work well with the telescope because
of this aberration.
For that reason, as well as aperture fever,
I sold the 80-mm achromat and purchased a
4-inch f/7.9 apochromatic refractor. The
The William Optics
Megrez 120-mm
Refractor
NOTE FROM EDITOR
A feature article detailing the functionality of the William Optics
Digital Display Gauge is scheduled for followup this spring in ATT.
The particular WO Megrez 120 that Dr. Dire tested was shipped by
William Optics to Suffern, New York, for display at WO’s NEAF
2010 exhibit, and the Digital Display Gauge was demonstrated re-
peatedly while there. The subject scope was then shipped by ATT from
Suffern to its offices in Louisiana, where it was tested for accuracy of
collimation and overall mechanical and digital function. From there
telescope was shipped by ATT to Dr. Dire’s home in Hawaii. By the
time he received the scope, the DDG would not power on.
The cause of failure of the DDG unit to power on is simple:
ATT ’s managing editor has since confessed to having drained the bat-
tery in the DDG unit and forgetting to replace it before repacking the
scope for shipment to Dr. Dire. The DDG feature was just too cool
for him to resist using the battery to exhaustion.
Comments to this Manuals